at the very point of decadence

“we select a single bit of ground as the natural center of the historical system, and make it the central sun. from it all events of history receive their real light; from it their importance is judged in perspective.”---ozzie Spengler. decline of the west___________ ozzie tells us all history is a matter of perspective…subjective…you cannot take the historian out of the history and the holy grail of historians, primary sources, are usually written by someone who was involved in the described events…someone with a perspective…and, quite possibly , an agenda…objectivity in history is a much rarer commodity than historians would lead you to believe…why you can find a “factual history” to support any viewpoint…all history is revisionist too…as wolgang shivelbusch rightly points out, the losers never go away…they lay low and retrench…harden attitudes…mythologize explanations for failure…and as time goes on begin to revise history…hans nossack started the revision of the bombing war in euurope..but he wrote in german and was not published in English until recently…w.g.sebald was among the first to point out that not everyone killed in an air raid in Germany was a nazi and jorg friedrich has written a damning portrait of churchill and “bomber” harris as perpetrators of terrorist tactics in pursuit of the defeat of a no less criminal regime…both sides deliberately targeted civilian populations in the name of some greater good…real or imagined…the upshot is everyone in a war commits war crimes…the winners just don’t go to trial…there have been winners and losers here too…politically and economically and they haven’t disappeared either…the north/south disconnect is the most obvious one…and the one the most ink and actual blood has been spilled over…and the losers there did not disappear…even though there is a remarkable movement afoot to sanitize history and remove all traces of the short lived southern nation hood...orwell’s “memory hole” alive and still in the never ending business of revision…there are other , less clear, divisions around…some years ago there was a book by joel garreau titled the nine nations of north America…which isn’t a bad starting point but I sat down with a relief map of the united states and a red pen and came up with fourteen…and now that California is set to vote on whether or not to divide itself into the fifty-first and second states in November ozzie’s view that there is a life cycle to nations and that they all decline and expire may seem to be born out…in these trumpist times ( when the republican national committee is demanding loyalty oaths to der fur hair ) the social connection that is nationhood seems to be unplugging itself…the disconnect is palpable, the poles are moving farther apart, and there seems to be a conscious effort to distort and muddy the waters…no firm grip on events…so we stumble from seizure to seizure seeming to accept what orwell called “catastrophic gradualism” ...things relentlessly and unstoppably moving from bad to worse in increments…orwell argued against that acceptance and Isaiah berlin maintained there was no “historical inevitability” in direct opposition to ozzie…i would probably agree with the two former over the latter…but how to tell when no one has the vaguest idea of who is in possession of the facts, who is distorting, and who just doesn’t know…well…no one does…not even those who purport to know…so…act where you can on what you see around you…help people who obviously need it…say something when you see an injustice…and get off your dead ass and vote ( where and when the powers that be allow it …i vote in every election so I am not purged )..an individual vote doesn’t really mean much…in general my votes go to losers anyway… the point is the politicians among us hate it when a lot of people vote…it makes things a lot less predictable and those rat fucks depend on our habitual apathy ( or voting patterns ) to get their way…no you won’t change the world…or maybe even stop califronia from self-destructing…you might make some gop senator think twice before declaring allegiance to the fur hair prinzip…there is no inevitable….( by the by…hitler stole the whole deal from georg von schonerer…there is no originality in politics...again...just a dependence on the habitual behaviors of the polity )

it's not a conspiracy...just pursuit of wealth

it is the eighth of june and, barring any unexpected action by the whores in congress, the internet as we know it dies monday...which may not be a bad thing in terms of local shopping and an end to hours of wasted time...it will still be an adjustment...my internet provider...

which is frontier communications ( a gross misnomer which i will endeavor to explain in a moment ) has, since the beginning of the year, been involved in what they are calling a "network upgrade project"...

"interruption or slowdown of service" they nailed...the "brief" part seems suspect from this end...i could, at one time, stream two screens of netflix and upload photos and blog to my heart's content...no more...even with one screen streaming my upload speed takes a mighty hit ( when i go to speed test.net the test has been failing to complete when it comes to upload speed..i consistently get an error message and no results) and i am left cooling my heels while a tortoise like upload ensues

my community"s part of this "upgrade" was scheduled to be finished by march thirty-first (sixty-nine days ago )...this somehow seems unlikely since the website has not shown it a s complete yet...i have tried to contact frontier..when i click on the "chat" icon on the site the icon vanishes and, unless waiting around fro quarter of an hour for someone to appear is not long enough, nothing in terms of communication ensues...remarkably i cannot get them on the phone either...this strikes me as evasion since i always could before...so what's up? is the "upgrade' a separation of the service into slow and fast lanes use of which depends on the stipend frontier gets from me? i have been accused of paranoia at times ( although the source of those accusations always struck me as being dogmatic responses to criticisms from someone who lacked adequate arguments to justify a position pre-selected for them by the hegemonic culture ) and there will be some who view this as another episode...i am inclined to think the pursuit of wealth in this consequentialist system will easily override any pathetic ( in the eyes of the subjectivist ) altruism or belief in any sort of equality of access...many will be left behind...i may be one...this may be the end of the fugitive

a primer

!.) to represent the interests and expand the prerogatives of those sectors of the polity with the most leverage in terms of wealth and/or influence over the opinions of the polity at large, whether they be individuals in possession of vast fortunes or powerful lobbies representing the needs and desires of an interested and overbearing segment of the population. _______ 2.) to enact, affirm, and enforce large swathes of legislation specifically written in arcane and convoluted language that legalize and lend a fatuous ethical base to the above mention special interests and prerogatives.